How much time will I actually save with Fazm?

Most users report saving 45-90 minutes per day on repetitive tasks. The biggest time savings come from email management (drafting replies, sorting, archiving), form filling (expense reports, CRM updates, applications), research (comparing products, gathering data from multiple sites), and social media (cross-posting, scheduling, replying). For example, booking a flight that normally takes 10 minutes of clicking through airline sites takes a single voice command with Fazm. Filing an expense report that requires opening a PDF, extracting numbers, and entering them into a spreadsheet becomes one spoken sentence. The more repetitive and multi-step your daily work is, the more time you get back.

What exactly can Fazm control?

Fazm controls everything you can do manually on your Mac. That includes mouse movements and clicks, keyboard typing, browser navigation and form filling, app switching, file management in Finder, and system-level actions. It uses direct browser DOM control for web interactions - meaning it reads and manipulates the actual page structure rather than taking screenshots and guessing where to click. For native macOS apps, Fazm uses accessibility APIs to interact with buttons, menus, text fields, and other UI elements. This works across any application: Chrome, Safari, VS Code, Slack, Figma, Terminal, Mail, Calendar, and more.

How is Fazm different from ChatGPT or Claude?

Chatbots like ChatGPT and Claude give you answers in a conversation window. Fazm takes action directly on your computer. When you say 'reply to Sarah's email,' Fazm opens your email app, finds Sarah's message, writes a contextual reply, and sends it. A chatbot would tell you what to write, but you still have to do all the clicking and typing yourself. Fazm moves your mouse, types on your keyboard, clicks buttons, and navigates between apps. It is a computer agent, not a chat assistant.

How does the memory layer work?

Fazm builds a personal knowledge graph by extracting information from your files, browsing history, conversations, and daily activity. Over time, it learns your contacts (names, emails, relationships), accounts and credentials, preferences (formatting, tone, scheduling habits), and frequently used workflows. In your first week, you might say 'Reply to Sarah's email, she's my cofounder, her email is sarah@acme.com.' By week four, you just say 'Reply to Sarah' because Fazm already knows who she is. By week eight, Fazm can draft the reply before you even ask. All of this data stays locally on your Mac - your knowledge graph never leaves your machine or gets sent to any cloud service.

Is Fazm safe? Can it mess up my computer?

Safety is built into every layer of Fazm. You watch every action in real-time on your screen - Fazm moves your mouse and types visibly, so there is nothing hidden. You can stop any action at any point by pressing a keyboard shortcut. Fazm also shows you what it plans to do before executing destructive actions like deleting files or sending emails, giving you a chance to confirm or cancel. Because Fazm is open source, the code is fully auditable on GitHub. There is no hidden behavior, no background processes making changes you cannot see, and no actions that bypass your screen.

What platforms does Fazm support?

Fazm currently supports macOS, running natively on both Apple Silicon (M1, M2, M3, M4) and Intel Macs. It is built with Swift and uses macOS-specific frameworks like ScreenCaptureKit for screen analysis and Accessibility APIs for app control, which is why macOS is the primary platform. Windows and Linux support are on the roadmap but do not have release dates yet. You can also control your Mac remotely from your phone using Fazm Remote, which gives you voice access to your desktop while you are away from your computer.

How does Fazm voice input work?

One keyboard shortcut activates push-to-talk. Hold the key, speak naturally about what you need done, and release. Fazm transcribes your speech locally using on-device models, so there is no network latency for the voice recognition step. You do not need wake words like 'Hey Siri' or 'OK Google' - just press and talk. You can also type commands into the floating toolbar if you prefer text input. Fazm understands natural language, so you do not need to memorize specific commands. Say 'book me a flight to Tokyo next Thursday' or 'find the cheapest AirPods on Amazon' and Fazm figures out the steps.

Is my data sent to the cloud?

Fazm processes screen analysis and memory entirely on your machine. The personal knowledge graph, file indexing, and screen capture all run locally. The only data that leaves your Mac is the intent - a text description of what you want to accomplish, which is sent to the AI model (Claude or GPT) for action planning. Your actual screen content, file contents, browsing history, and personal knowledge graph never leave your computer. Fazm is also open source, so you can verify exactly what data is transmitted by reading the code on GitHub. For users who need complete air-gapped operation, local model support is planned.

Back to Blog

Atlas vs Comet vs Desktop Agents - Escaping the Browser Trap

Fazm Team·March 17, 2026·2 min read

atlascometbrowser-trapdesktop-agentcomparison

Atlas vs Comet vs Desktop Agents - Escaping the Browser Trap

Atlas and Comet represent a growing category of browser-based AI agents. They take screenshots of your browser, identify UI elements, and execute clicks and keystrokes to complete tasks. For browser-contained workflows, they are genuinely useful.

But both share the same fundamental limitation: they only work inside a browser.

How Browser Agents Work

Browser-based agents typically use one of two approaches. Screenshot analysis identifies elements visually - the agent looks at the screen, finds the "Submit" button, and clicks its coordinates. DOM-based agents read the page structure directly and target elements by their HTML attributes.

Screenshot-based control is more fragile. Every UI change can break element identification. DOM-based control is more reliable but still limited to web pages. Neither approach can interact with native applications.

How Desktop Agents Differ

Desktop agents operate at the operating system level. On macOS, they use the accessibility API to read and interact with elements across every application - browsers, native apps, system dialogs, menu bars. The agent sees a unified view of your entire workspace, not just one browser window.

This scope difference matters more than the control method. An agent that can navigate your browser, switch to your terminal, update a spreadsheet, and send a message in Slack can automate workflows that cross application boundaries. Browser agents can only automate the parts of your workflow that happen in a browser tab.

The Control Method Matters Too

Screenshot-based agents send images to an LLM for interpretation on every action. This is slow (each step requires an API round trip) and expensive (image tokens cost more). Accessibility tree-based agents read structured element data locally, making them faster and cheaper per action.

Picking the Right Tool

If your automation lives entirely in the browser - filling web forms, scraping data, navigating web apps - browser agents work fine. If your workflow crosses application boundaries, which most real workflows do, you need a desktop agent that is not trapped in a single app context.

The browser is one application. Your workflow spans many.

Fazm is an open source macOS AI agent. Open source on GitHub.

Atlas vs Comet vs Desktop Agents - Escaping the Browser Trap

Atlas vs Comet vs Desktop Agents - Escaping the Browser Trap

How Browser Agents Work

How Desktop Agents Differ

The Control Method Matters Too

Picking the Right Tool

Related Posts

Native Desktop Agent vs Cloud VM - Why We Chose to Run on Your Actual Mac

Accessibility APIs vs OCR - Two Approaches to Desktop Agent Vision

Can AI Agents Control DaVinci Resolve? Desktop Automation for Video Editing