Vibe Coding Is Not an Excuse to Skip Code Review
Vibe Coding Is Not an Excuse to Skip Code Review
There is a growing confusion in engineering leadership between "using AI to move faster" and "not caring about quality." A new CTO walks in, hears about vibe coding, and suddenly every sprint is about output volume instead of correctness.
I use AI heavily building a macOS app. Multiple agents running in parallel, generating code across the entire codebase. And yes, I ship faster than I ever could writing everything by hand. But I still review everything.
Speed Without Review Is Just Technical Debt
The vibe coding movement gets one thing right - you should not be precious about every line. Let the AI handle boilerplate, scaffolding, and repetitive patterns. But the output still needs a human eye. AI-generated code has a specific failure mode: it looks correct. The syntax is clean, the variable names make sense, and the logic reads well. But edge cases get silently dropped, error handling gets simplified, and subtle bugs hide behind well-formatted code.
What Actually Works
Use AI to write the first draft. Then review it like you would review a junior developer's pull request. Check the logic, not just the syntax. Run the tests. Look for what is missing, not just what is there.
The teams that do this well ship faster AND maintain quality. The teams that skip review ship fast for two months, then spend six months fixing the mess.
The Real Leadership Problem
If your CTO thinks vibe coding means "stop reviewing code," the problem is not the tooling. It is a misunderstanding of what AI coding tools actually do. They generate code faster. They do not generate correct code automatically.
The best developers I know use AI more than anyone else - and review more carefully than anyone else. Those two things are not contradictory. They are complementary.
Fazm is an open source macOS AI agent. Open source on GitHub.