How much time will I actually save with Fazm?

Most users report saving 45-90 minutes per day on repetitive tasks. The biggest time savings come from email management (drafting replies, sorting, archiving), form filling (expense reports, CRM updates, applications), research (comparing products, gathering data from multiple sites), and social media (cross-posting, scheduling, replying). For example, booking a flight that normally takes 10 minutes of clicking through airline sites takes a single voice command with Fazm. Filing an expense report that requires opening a PDF, extracting numbers, and entering them into a spreadsheet becomes one spoken sentence. The more repetitive and multi-step your daily work is, the more time you get back.

What exactly can Fazm control?

Fazm controls everything you can do manually on your Mac. That includes mouse movements and clicks, keyboard typing, browser navigation and form filling, app switching, file management in Finder, and system-level actions. It uses direct browser DOM control for web interactions - meaning it reads and manipulates the actual page structure rather than taking screenshots and guessing where to click. For native macOS apps, Fazm uses accessibility APIs to interact with buttons, menus, text fields, and other UI elements. This works across any application: Chrome, Safari, VS Code, Slack, Figma, Terminal, Mail, Calendar, and more.

How is Fazm different from ChatGPT or Claude?

Chatbots like ChatGPT and Claude give you answers in a conversation window. Fazm takes action directly on your computer. When you say 'reply to Sarah's email,' Fazm opens your email app, finds Sarah's message, writes a contextual reply, and sends it. A chatbot would tell you what to write, but you still have to do all the clicking and typing yourself. Fazm moves your mouse, types on your keyboard, clicks buttons, and navigates between apps. It is a computer agent, not a chat assistant.

How does the memory layer work?

Fazm builds a personal knowledge graph by extracting information from your files, browsing history, conversations, and daily activity. Over time, it learns your contacts (names, emails, relationships), accounts and credentials, preferences (formatting, tone, scheduling habits), and frequently used workflows. In your first week, you might say 'Reply to Sarah's email, she's my cofounder, her email is sarah@acme.com.' By week four, you just say 'Reply to Sarah' because Fazm already knows who she is. By week eight, Fazm can draft the reply before you even ask. All of this data stays locally on your Mac - your knowledge graph never leaves your machine or gets sent to any cloud service.

Is Fazm safe? Can it mess up my computer?

Safety is built into every layer of Fazm. You watch every action in real-time on your screen - Fazm moves your mouse and types visibly, so there is nothing hidden. You can stop any action at any point by pressing a keyboard shortcut. Fazm also shows you what it plans to do before executing destructive actions like deleting files or sending emails, giving you a chance to confirm or cancel. Because Fazm is open source, the code is fully auditable on GitHub. There is no hidden behavior, no background processes making changes you cannot see, and no actions that bypass your screen.

What platforms does Fazm support?

Fazm currently supports macOS, running natively on both Apple Silicon (M1, M2, M3, M4) and Intel Macs. It is built with Swift and uses macOS-specific frameworks like ScreenCaptureKit for screen analysis and Accessibility APIs for app control, which is why macOS is the primary platform. Windows and Linux support are on the roadmap but do not have release dates yet. You can also control your Mac remotely from your phone using Fazm Remote, which gives you voice access to your desktop while you are away from your computer.

How does Fazm voice input work?

One keyboard shortcut activates push-to-talk. Hold the key, speak naturally about what you need done, and release. Fazm transcribes your speech locally using on-device models, so there is no network latency for the voice recognition step. You do not need wake words like 'Hey Siri' or 'OK Google' - just press and talk. You can also type commands into the floating toolbar if you prefer text input. Fazm understands natural language, so you do not need to memorize specific commands. Say 'book me a flight to Tokyo next Thursday' or 'find the cheapest AirPods on Amazon' and Fazm figures out the steps.

Is my data sent to the cloud?

Fazm processes screen analysis and memory entirely on your machine. The personal knowledge graph, file indexing, and screen capture all run locally. The only data that leaves your Mac is the intent - a text description of what you want to accomplish, which is sent to the AI model (Claude or GPT) for action planning. Your actual screen content, file contents, browsing history, and personal knowledge graph never leave your computer. Fazm is also open source, so you can verify exactly what data is transmitted by reading the code on GitHub. For users who need complete air-gapped operation, local model support is planned.

Back to Blog

Blast Radius - What Happens When Your AI Agent Gets Compromised

Fazm Team·March 17, 2026·2 min read

securityai-agentblast-radiusmcptrust-boundary

Smaller Blast Radius by Design

An MCP server that controls your desktop through the accessibility API has a naturally smaller blast radius than one with shell access. It can click buttons, read text, and navigate menus - but it cannot run arbitrary commands, delete files, or exfiltrate data through a terminal.

In theory, this is a meaningful security boundary. An agent that can only interact through the UI is limited to what the UI exposes. It cannot bypass application-level permissions or access files the current app does not show.

The Practice Problem

In practice, the security story gets complicated. Most desktop agent setups run the MCP server and other tools - including shell access through Claude Code - in the same session. The agent that is "limited to UI access" also has a tool that can run rm -rf / if it decides to.

This is not a bug in any individual tool. It is an architecture problem. When you give an agent multiple tools with different permission levels, the effective blast radius is the union of all tools, not the intersection.

Assessing Real Blast Radius

To honestly evaluate your agent's blast radius, ask these questions:

What is the worst single action the agent could take? Not the intended action - the worst possible one given its full toolset.
Are permission boundaries enforced or behavioral? If the only thing stopping the agent from running shell commands is the system prompt saying "do not use the shell tool," that is a behavioral constraint, not a technical one.
What data can the agent access through the UI? The accessibility API exposes every text field, every label, every value on screen. Banking apps, password managers, email - all readable.

Practical Mitigations

Run agents with the minimum toolset needed for the task. If a workflow only needs UI automation, do not attach a shell tool. Use separate sessions for different permission levels. Log every action for audit.

The goal is not zero risk - it is honest risk assessment. Know your actual blast radius, not your theoretical one.

Fazm is an open source macOS AI agent. Open source on GitHub.

Blast Radius - What Happens When Your AI Agent Gets Compromised

Smaller Blast Radius by Design

The Practice Problem

Assessing Real Blast Radius

Practical Mitigations

More on This Topic

Related Posts

Why Your AI Agent Needs a Firewall - And Why It Should Be Open Source

Privacy Controls Are the Real Story in AI Agent Frameworks

The Asymmetric Trust Problem - When Your AI Agent Has More Access Than You Intended